Kegiatan Praktik dalam Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Literatur tentang Fungsi Eksperimen dan Demonstrasi dalam Pengembangan Pemahaman Konseptual dan Keterampilan Proses Sains
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71094/mandalawidya.v2i3.221Keywords:
practical activities, experiments, demonstrations, elementary school, science process skills, science learningAbstract
Practical activities constitute an important component of elementary science learning because they provide students with opportunities to connect scientific concepts with observable phenomena. This literature review examines the pedagogical functions of experiments and demonstrations in elementary school learning, particularly in developing conceptual understanding, science process skills, critical thinking, learning engagement, scientific attitudes, social competencies, and authentic assessment. A narrative-integrative literature review was conducted by examining 25 relevant scientific and policy sources published primarily between 2004 and 2026. Sources were selected based on thematic relevance, scholarly credibility, methodological contribution, and direct relevance to science learning, inquiry, practical work, experiments, or demonstrations. The synthesis indicates that practical activities are most effective when they integrate physical engagement (hands-on) with cognitive processing (minds-on). Experiments provide greater opportunities for students to manipulate variables, collect evidence, and construct conclusions, whereas demonstrations are particularly useful when activities involve safety risks, complex equipment, limited resources, or the need for teacher modeling. However, physical activity alone does not automatically produce conceptual understanding. Teacher questioning, scaffolding, prediction, observation, discussion, evidence-based explanation, and reflection are critical mediating factors. The review concludes that experiments and demonstrations should be positioned as complementary pedagogical strategies within guided inquiry rather than as competing instructional methods.
References
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
Abrahams, I., & Reiss, M. J. (2012). Practical work: Its effectiveness in primary and secondary schools in England. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 1035–1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21036
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017
Anjarwani, R., Doyin, M., & Indiatmoko, B. (2020). Guided inquiry learning with outdoor activities setting to improve critical thinking ability and science process skills of elementary school students. Journal of Primary Education, 9(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpe.v9i2.36178
Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2024). Effects of inquiry-based approaches on students’ higher-order thinking skills in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216
Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan. (2024). Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Nomor 032/H/KR/2024 tentang capaian pembelajaran pada pendidikan anak usia dini, jenjang pendidikan dasar, dan jenjang pendidikan menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Estrella, G., Au, J., Jaeggi, S. M., & Collins, P. (2018). Is inquiry science instruction effective for English language learners? A meta-analytic review. AERA Open, 4(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418767402
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
Ginting, B., Limiansih, K., & Hadiyanti, A. H. D. (2023). Science process skills analysis of class IV students of Kanisius Sengkan Yogyakarta Elementary School in science learning content. JPPIPA (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA), 8(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v8n2.p73-79
Hadi, S., Sa’diyah, L., Yani, J., & Wulandari, A. M. (2025). Rekayasa Jean Piaget: Teori perkembangan kognitif dalam konsepsi anak di usia sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan: Riset dan Konseptual, 9(1), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.28926/riset_konseptual.v9i1.1139
Harlen, W. (2015). Working with big ideas of science education. InterAcademy Partnership.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
Hugerat, M., Lafi, M., & Asli, S. (2026). Enhancing third-grade students’ academic achievement and scientific attitudes through experimental demonstrations on alternative energy in Arab-community schools. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/17869
Khumraksa, B., & Burachat, P. (2022). The scientific questioning and experimental skills of elementary school students: The intervention of research-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(4), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i4.36807
Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
Munjiah, A. U., & Utari, E. (2026). Penilaian autentik berbasis unjuk kerja untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains pada peserta didik kelas 4 di Sekolah Dasar Negeri 2 Binong. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 10(1), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v10i1.1986
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
Nollmeyer, G. E., Morrison, J., & Baldwin, K. A. (2019). Barriers to authentic science inquiry in the elementary classroom. Educational Research: Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–6.
Oliveira, H., & Bonito, J. (2023). Practical work in science education: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1151641. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1151641
Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K–12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
Rajata, R. B., & Suryani, E. (2026). Studi komparatif metode demonstrasi dan eksperimen terhadap keterampilan proses sains siswa sekolah dasar. Paedagogie, 21(1), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.31603/paedagogie.v21i1.15968
Ulfayantik, S., Jatmiko, B., & Supardi, Z. A. I. (2022). Development of online learning media using guided inquiry to improve science process skills of elementary school students assisted by Microsoft Office 365. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 11(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v11n2.p142-151
Urdanivia Alarcón, D. A., Talavera-Mendoza, F., Rucano Paucar, F. H., Cayani Caceres, K. S., & Machaca Viza, R. (2023). Science and inquiry-based teaching and learning: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1170487. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1170487
Wörner, S., Kuhn, J., & Scheiter, K. (2022). The best of two worlds: A systematic review on combining real and virtual experiments in science education. Review of Educational Research, 92(6), 911–952. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221079417
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhamad Fajri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


