Konsep Vicarious Liability dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71094/jhb.v1i3.185Keywords:
Vicarious Liability, Criminal Liability, Corporate.Abstract
This study aims to determine corporate criminal liability and one form of punishment, namely the theory of vicarious liability. One of the white-collar crimes, namely corporate crime, is increasingly vital and strategic, not only can it help economic movement but can also trigger criminal acts. One example is corruption or money laundering. This study uses a normative research method conducted with a statute approach and a case approach. Normative juridical research is a research methodology used through the study of theories, concepts, and laws and regulations relevant to the identified problem. This is carried out in order to apply a normative approach that includes examining various laws and regulations and collecting supporting documentation in the library. The results of the study show that corporate criminal liability was first recognized within the framework of criminal law relating to economic activities, as stated in Emergency Law No. 17 of 1951 concerning Hoarding of Goods. Then the Vicarious Liability Doctrine was taken from civil law which is commonly known as an unlawful act as the doctrine of respondent superior. When viewed from this principle, a corporation cannot make mistakes only its managers make mistakes as those who act for and on behalf of the corporation and commit mistakes as those who act for and on behalf of the corporation and carry out actions that bring benefits to the corporation.
References
Ali, M. (2013). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Korporasi. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Ali, M. (2022). Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Amin, S. M. E., & Ahmad Syaufi, I. (2024). Penerapan Prinsip Vicarious Liability Terhadap Korporasi yang Melakukan Kegiatan Usaha Pertambangan dalam Kawasan Hutan Tanpa Ijin Menteri. 9(3), 743–754. https://snllb.ulm.ac.id/prosiding/index.php/snllb-lit/article/view/1114
Bambang, J. I., Hafizah, S., & Liana, N. (2024). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Kejahatan Korporasi Pada Lingkungan. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 2(2), 505–511. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v2i2.521
Faturachman, F. A., Hutasoit, T. J., & Hosnah, A. U. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 4(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v4i2.731
Febryani, E., Iwari, D. P., & Aprita, S. (2024). Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Sebagai Dampak Penuntutan Terhadap Korporasi Akibat Pailit. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v7i1.1173
Gemilang, G., Ismaidar, I., & Zarzani, T. R. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(2), 8455–8471. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i2.10027
Herawati, E., Mustopa, H., Sander, M., & Fujianti, P. J. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Luar Biasa di Bidang Ekonomi. Jurnal Sosial Teknologi, 5(7), 2819–2831. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v5i7.32225
Iswari, F., & Azriadi, A. (2022). Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Serta Pengaturannya Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Sumbang12 Law Journal, 1(1), 1–22.
Kurniawan, K. D., & Hapsari, D. R. I. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi menurut vicarious liability theory. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(2), 324–346. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art5
Prakasa, R. S., Utami, M. U. M., Wastsaljideri, C., & Sari, I. W. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup. PUAN INDONESIA, 5(2), 746–755. https://doi.org/10.37296/jpi.v5i2.289
Pratama, D. J., Ali, N., & Nugraha, S. (2025). Studi tentang Implikasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi sebagai Pelaku Kejahatan Ekonomi. MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(1), 158–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.52947/morality.v11i1.937
Purnomo, E., Sudewo, F. A., & Aryani, F. D. (2024). Pertanggung Jawaban Korporasi sebagai Pelaku Kejahatan (Kasus PT Cakrawala Nusa Dimensi dan PT Agroindomas). Social, Educational, Learning and Language (SELL), 2(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.61930/sell.v2i1.80
Rodliyah, R., Suryani, A., & Husni, L. (2020). Konsep pertanggungjawaban pidana Korporasi (Corporate Crime) dalam sistem HuKum pidana indonesia. Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum, 5(1), 191–206.
Sahim, M. S., Kurnia, M. P., & Wardana, K. W. (2025). Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Atas Kecelakaan Tongkang dalam Perspektif Doktrin Vicarious Liability di Sempadan Sungai Mahakam. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 13(2), 552–564.
Saputra, F. R., Hafrida, H., & Liyus, H. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Kepabeanan di Indonesia. Jurnal Supremasi, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v15i1.4178
Sari, N. K. A., & Saly, J. N. (2023). Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Pidana Korporasi Menurut Vicarious Liability Theory. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, 17(5), 3507–3518. http://dx.doi.org/10.35931/aq.v17i5.2653
Sitompul, R. K., & Yusuf, H. (2024). Dampak Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Khusus Terhadap Stabilitas Ekonomi Nasional: Studi Tentang Kasus Kartel Di Sektor Industri. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 1(9), 5309–5329.
Yohanes, W., & Yusuf, H. (2024). Dampak tindak pidana ekonomi khusus terhadap investasi asing: Analisis kasus kejahatan korporasi di sektor industri. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 1(9), 5095–5111.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Daffa Putra Perdana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
