Relasi Bentuk Bunyi dan Makna dalam Penamaan Fauna Sawah Bahasa Mbojo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71094/jlmm.v1i2.140Keywords:
Ethnosemantics, Phonotactics, Fauna Naming, Paddy Field Fauna, Mbojo Language, Ethnolinguistics, Ethnobiological ClassificationAbstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between phonotactic patterns and ethnosemantic classification in the naming of rice-field fauna in the Mbojo language spoken by the Bima–Dompu community. This research departs from the assumption that folk biological naming is not arbitrary but reflects ecological knowledge and cultural categorization developed through agrarian experience. Using a qualitative–descriptive approach, the study applies Mahsun’s linguistic research methodology, including data collection through observation and interviews, data analysis using intralingual and extralingual matching methods, and informal data presentation. The data consist of rice-field fauna lexicons beginning with the initial syllables ka- and sa-, along with associated ecological and cultural information. The analysis is grounded in Berlin’s theory of ethnobiological classification and Jakobson’s phonological and phonotactic framework. The findings indicate that lexicons with the initial syllable ka- predominantly denote small fauna, especially insects and organisms directly interacting with rice plants, which are perceived as part of the ecological background of the fields. In contrast, lexicons beginning with sa- tend to refer to larger vertebrates, economically valuable animals, or fauna considered dangerous. These patterns demonstrate that the initial syllables ka- and sa- function as implicit ethnosemantic markers shaped by cultural convention and collective ecological experience. This study highlights the integration of phonological structure and ecological knowledge in the Mbojo folk naming system.
References
Abrori, M. (2017). Etnolinguistik: Relasi bahasa, budaya, dan pengetahuan lokal. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Franco, F. M., Medeiros, P. M., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2022). Folk biological classification and naming systems: Advances and challenges in ethnobiology. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 18(1), 1–15.
Hidayati, N., Suryadi, M., & Lestari, D. (2022). Penamaan tumbuhan pangan pada masyarakat adat: Kajian etnolinguistik. Jurnal Linguistik Indonesia, 40(2), 145–160.
Iskandar, J., Partasasmita, R., & Permana, R. C. E. (2024). Leksikon fauna dan pengetahuan ekologi lokal masyarakat agraris di Indonesia. Humaniora, 36(1), 25–40.
Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.
Leo, A. (2021). Penamaan fauna dalam bahasa daerah Maluku: Perspektif etnolinguistik. Lingua, 18(1), 89–104.
Mahsun. (2017). Metode penelitian bahasa: Tahapan, strategi, metode, dan tekniknya (Edisi revisi). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sudirman. (2020). Sistem morfologi dan variasi fonologis bahasa Bima. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 20(2), 110–123.
Xiao, Y., & Yang, L. (2022). Loss of folk ecological knowledge and changes in traditional naming systems. Sustainability, 14(5), 1–14.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 aryanah hilman, firmansyah firmansyah, ernaliana ernaliana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


